Climate Change: War Is The Problem, Not Dogs And Cats

In the not-too-distant future, owning a pet might land you in the doghouse. Of course, the World Economic Forum (WEF) swears it does not want to slaughter millions of dogs and cats to fight climate change, but are they to be trusted? After all, Net Zero Living is the deep state’s next move, and they’ve cleverly got their bases covered to exploit society into compliance. Like the fear created around COVID, it’s all about the narrative. And when it comes to our beloved pets, the foundation has been laid to suggest that the environmental impact of pets is contributing to climate change.

Studies like the often-cited 2017 paper titled “Environmental impacts of food consumption by dogs and cats” by UCLA’s Geography Professor Gregory S. Okin have helped shape the story that our four-legged friends are a burden to the earth’s future. Why? In addition to “rising infectious diseases from pathogens caused by climate change,” the globalist cabal has declared that the pet and pet food industries contribute to “increasing heatwaves and pathogens.” An article last May in Earth.org claimed:

“An average-sized cat can produce 310 kilograms (CO2e) annually. An average-sized dog generates 770 kg of CO2e, and an even bigger dog can emit upwards of 2,500 kilograms of CO2e, which is twice as much as the emissions deriving from an average family car per year.”

Share
Scroll to Top